4-5 poster series
In order to show in my posters:
1. taxonomy
2. evidence of research
3. how they link
4. and how different parts of design link with different taxonimies, etc...
I have chosen to present in this way:
Poster #3: I have started developing a diagram that sorts all the different taxonomies of the process I have gone through in order to 'taxonomize' and create.
Understand > Apply > Analyze > Evaluate > Create...
(not sure if this is the final order or most appropriate words for now, but will go with it)
Street shot panoramic at the bottom with work like a footnote of taxonomies, including the little snap shots above. Obviously still not finished putting this together, but I have mocked up how it should look. Possibly smaller.
1. taxonomy
2. evidence of research
3. how they link
4. and how different parts of design link with different taxonimies, etc...
I have chosen to present in this way:
Poster #3: I have started developing a diagram that sorts all the different taxonomies of the process I have gone through in order to 'taxonomize' and create.
Understand > Apply > Analyze > Evaluate > Create...
(not sure if this is the final order or most appropriate words for now, but will go with it)
Street shot panoramic at the bottom with work like a footnote of taxonomies, including the little snap shots above. Obviously still not finished putting this together, but I have mocked up how it should look. Possibly smaller.
25 September 2007 at 09:00
I think to mash it all together like this is to confuse what's good or interesting about each thing. It's like you've got three projects and put them all together as one thing, but I can't see that this improves any of them in any way. In fact I think it detracts, and it stops you focusing on 'finishing' any particular one in a way that might be called successful.
Basically I just think you should deal with each of these ideas individually, and work torwards each having it's own logical end.
I think you tend to focus on 'presentation' in a way that you think might negate content, but I don't think this works. It just points up the lack of thought/analysis in the content.
I'll write more specific comments on the appropriate posts... but just so this doesn't sound like it's all negative, I do think that this is finally beginning to 'open up' a bit, and show some potential of looking like a 'body of work'. And in that sense it's finally starting to look like you're researching 'through' designing... which is good.
L
25 September 2007 at 09:09
One more thing...
A problem with your use of 'taxonomy'... you still haven't taxonomized anything? Which is what we keep talking about, and what I keep trying to get you to do — go back to those posters and actually do a series of different taxonomies of street typography...
I can't see how you can move on without doing this?
L