<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/5424045260746825874?origin\x3dhttp://missgalina.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

a better poster concept

I think I'm finally getting these posters resolved. I have to work on my text, something that better reflects each taxonomy and my verdicts about design from my 3 categories of design this year (student, in-house, freelance). Probably also try what i did in the previous poster idea and place an image that fits into that particular taxonomy into each character of the text that i come up with.

“a better poster concept”

  1. Anonymous Anonymous Says:

    I like the previous one better simply because it has more images in it, and so it therefore requires you to think about a taxonomy of some sort. Like I say the whole 'taxonomy' thing is still actually missing from your work.

    I think you could still have better text than this too? This statement just seems like it could relate to anything and everything... and everything can quickly evaporate into nothing.

    It'd be good if you could look at your images and say 'ok I've got these 5 categories'... and then give each one a name that relates to the category (which is an 'idea' which works as an organising principle), and then write or find a statement that says something about that idea.

    Do you see what I mean? I mean it should be simple. But point to some deeper complexity...

    On a basic level I think there simply aren't enough images here. I don't see how putting 2 or 3 things together can really constitute a 'taxonomy'?

    L